2004 Kia Spectra vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Spectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Spectra would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2004 Kia Spectra. (125 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Spectra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Spectra weights approximately 149 kg more than 2009 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Spectra. (161 Nm). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Spectra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Spectra | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | Spectra | Matrix |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.4 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |