2004 Kia Sportage vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Kia Sportage is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Sportage (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Sportage should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Because 2004 Kia Sportage is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Sportage will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Sportage (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Kia Sportage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Sportage | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | Sportage | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2620 mm |