2004 Lada 111 vs. 1996 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Lada 111 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2004 Lada 111. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2004 Lada 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lada 111 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lada 111. (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lada 111.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lada 111 | 1996 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Lada | Lotus |
Model | 111 | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2260 mm |