2004 Lada 111 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Lada 111 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Lada 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lada 111 (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lada 111 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lada 111 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lada 111 (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Lada 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lada 111 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lada | Renault |
| Model | 111 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |
