2004 Lada 2123 vs. 1979 Zastava 132
To start off, 2004 Lada 2123 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,754 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2004 Lada 2123. (77 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 2004 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lada 2123 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1979 Zastava 132.
Because 2004 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Zastava 132 (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lada 2123. (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1979 Zastava 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lada 2123 | 1979 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Lada | Zastava |
Model | 2123 | 132 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1754 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2560 mm |