2004 Lamborghini Murcielago vs. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 456 kg more than 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago.
Because 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago | 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Lamborghini | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Murcielago | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6195 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 580 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 2106 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 23.5 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 109 L |
