2004 Lamborghini Murcielago vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago would be higher. At 6,195 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago (580 HP) has 266 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (314 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 218 kg more than 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago (637 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (373 Nm). This means 2004 Lamborghini Murcielago will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lamborghini Murcielago | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Lamborghini | Cadillac |
Model | Murcielago | CTS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6195 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 580 HP | 314 HP |
Torque | 637 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 11.3 |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1868 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 18.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 26.1 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 23.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 68 L |