2004 Lancia Phedra vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Lancia Phedra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Lancia Phedra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lancia Phedra (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lancia Phedra should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lancia Phedra weights approximately 428 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lancia Phedra (270 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Lancia Phedra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lancia Phedra | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Phedra | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.4 seconds | 11 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1773 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |