2004 Lancia Ypsilon vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2004 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lancia Ypsilon (94 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lancia Ypsilon should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lancia Ypsilon weights approximately 377 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lancia Ypsilon. (128 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lancia Ypsilon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lancia Ypsilon | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Ypsilon | 220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 45 L |