2004 Lancia Zeta vs. 1973 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2004 Lancia Zeta is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lancia Zeta (129 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 616 kg more than 1973 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lancia Zeta (180 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: