2004 Lancia Zeta vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 2004 Lancia Zeta is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lancia Zeta (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 735 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lancia Zeta (180 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Lancia Zeta 1982 Nissan Pulsar
Make Lancia Nissan
Model Zeta Pulsar
Year Released 2004 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1270 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 180 Nm 96 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1600 kg 865 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1720 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2420 mm