2004 Land Rover Discovery vs. 2013 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2013 Nissan Armada is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Discovery. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Discovery would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Armada (313 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2004 Land Rover Discovery. (217 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2004 Land Rover Discovery.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Discovery. (407 Nm). This means 2013 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Discovery.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Discovery | 2013 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Discovery | Armada |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4556 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 313 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 522 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5276 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2014 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1981 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 17.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 105 L |