2004 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Freelander | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Freelander | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 16 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 63 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |
