2004 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 1082 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Freelander | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Land Rover | Suzuki |
Model | Freelander | Fronte |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 18 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 32 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1582 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2060 mm |