2004 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1982 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Camry. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Camry.
Because 2004 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Camry. (166 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Freelander | 1982 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | Freelander | Camry |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 166 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |