2004 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2000 Nissan Pickup
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Pickup. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Pickup would be higher. At 2,494 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Pickup is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Pickup. (82 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Pickup.
Because 2004 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan Pickup. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Pickup. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Pickup.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Freelander | 2000 Nissan Pickup | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Freelander | Pickup |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 82 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2960 mm |
