2004 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Subaru Outback. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 2002 Subaru Outback.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Subaru Outback. (225 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Freelander | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Land Rover | Subaru |
Model | Freelander | Outback |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2455 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 225 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |