2004 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2011 Mazda 2

To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Freelander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Freelander would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 2. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 2.

Because 2004 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 2. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Land Rover Freelander 2011 Mazda 2
Make Land Rover Mazda
Model Freelander 2
Year Released 2004 2011
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2491 cc 1500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 174 HP 100 HP
Torque 240 Nm 133 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 3950 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1694 mm
Vehicle Height 1840 mm 1476 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2489 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.4 L/100km 6.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.2 L/100km 8.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 43 L