2004 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Freelander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Freelander would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2004 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Freelander | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Freelander | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 46 L |