2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1231 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Land Rover | Triumph |
Model | Range Rover | Renown |
Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 1284 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2750 mm |