2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1952 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. (24 HP @ 3300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1813 kg more than 1952 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1952 Volkswagen Beetle | |
| Make | Land Rover | Volkswagen |
| Model | Range Rover | Beetle |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1131 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 702 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1560 mm |
