2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1953 Renault Juva
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 258 more horse power than 1953 Renault Juva. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1953 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1630 kg more than 1953 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1953 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Land Rover | Renault |
| Model | Range Rover | Juva |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1003 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 24 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |
