2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1962 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 244 more horse power than 1962 Toyota Corona. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1962 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1502 kg more than 1962 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Toyota Corona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Toyota Corona. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1962 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Range Rover | Corona |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 68 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 22.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 75 L |
