2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 244 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2012 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Land Rover | Lotus |
| Model | Range Rover | Seven |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 38 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 29 L |
