2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 264 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1942 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Land Rover | Suzuki |
Model | Range Rover | Fronte |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 18 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 32 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 66 L |