2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1968 NSU 1000
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1968 NSU 1000. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1968 NSU 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1742 kg more than 1968 NSU 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 NSU 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 NSU 1000. (83 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1968 NSU 1000 | |
| Make | Land Rover | NSU |
| Model | Range Rover | 1000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 66.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 82 L |
