2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1573 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Range Rover | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2210 mm |
