2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 162 kg more than 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Range Rover | Corniche |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3030 mm |
