2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1976 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1366 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1976 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Range Rover | 929 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 134 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 55 L |