2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1978 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1978 Datsun 280Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1242 kg more than 1978 Datsun 280Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Datsun 280Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1978 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Land Rover | Datsun |
| Model | Range Rover | 280Z |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2304 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 60 L |
