2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 223 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1252 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Range Rover | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2530 mm |
