2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 235 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1620 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Land Rover | Volvo |
Model | Range Rover | 66 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 47 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1390 mm |