2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 960 kg more than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1981 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Land Rover | Chevrolet |
| Model | Range Rover | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2750 mm |
