2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 229 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1572 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | Range Rover | Lancer |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 90 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |