2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Range Rover | 626 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2620 mm |