2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1996 Renault Fifties
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Fifties. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Fifties would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 222 more horse power than 1996 Renault Fifties. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Fifties. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 867 kg more than 1996 Renault Fifties. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Fifties. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1996 Renault Fifties | |
| Make | Land Rover | Renault |
| Model | Range Rover | Fifties |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1099 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 60 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 60 L |
