2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Panoz Q9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (441 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Panoz |
| Model | Range Rover | Q9 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 59 L |
