2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1999 Toyota Retro Cruiser

To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Toyota Retro Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Toyota Retro Cruiser would be higher. At 4,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Toyota Retro Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1999 Toyota Retro Cruiser. (212 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1999 Toyota Retro Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 825 kg more than 1999 Toyota Retro Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Toyota Retro Cruiser. (373 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Toyota Retro Cruiser.

Compare all specifications: