2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (242 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 565 kg more than 2000 Toyota Tundra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Tundra. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2000 Toyota Tundra has manual transmission. 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | Range Rover | Tundra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 426 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3270 mm |