2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2002 Xedos 9
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Xedos 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Xedos 9 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2002 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2002 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 930 kg more than 2002 Xedos 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Xedos 9. (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 2002 Xedos 9 | |
Make | Land Rover | Xedos |
Model | Range Rover | 9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 212 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2760 mm |