2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph
To start off, 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (322 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph should accelerate faster than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 42 kg more than 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (490 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (441 Nm). This means 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 2005 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph | |
| Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Range Rover | Silver Seraph |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 5379 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 322 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 490 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3120 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 17.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 100 L |
