2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (440 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Land Rover | Holden |
| Model | Range Rover | Calais |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
