2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 172 more horse power than 2010 Renault Fluence. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Fluence. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1217 kg more than 2010 Renault Fluence. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Fluence. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Land Rover | Renault |
Model | Range Rover | Fluence |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2442 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2702 mm |