2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot RCZ has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot RCZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Land Rover | Peugeot |
| Model | Range Rover | RCZ |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1359 mm |
