2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2013 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (464 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 640 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XF.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Land Rover Range Rover 2013 Jaguar XF
Make Land Rover Jaguar
Model Range Rover XF
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4398 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 282 HP 464 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 440 Nm 450 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.1 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.7 mm 89 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2515 kg 1875 kg
Vehicle Length 4960 mm 4961 mm
Vehicle Width 2200 mm 2053 mm
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2909 mm