2004 Lexus ES vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lexus ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lexus ES would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2004 Lexus ES. (216 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Lexus ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 395 kg more than 2004 Lexus ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lexus ES. (325 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lexus ES.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lexus ES | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Lexus | Mazda |
Model | ES | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 1964 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |