2004 Lexus ES vs. 2012 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2012 Hyundai i20 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lexus ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lexus ES would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lexus ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lexus ES (216 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2012 Hyundai i20. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lexus ES should accelerate faster than 2012 Hyundai i20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lexus ES weights approximately 414 kg more than 2012 Hyundai i20. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lexus ES (325 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Hyundai i20. (137 Nm). This means 2004 Lexus ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Hyundai i20. 2004 Lexus ES has automatic transmission and 2012 Hyundai i20 has manual transmission. 2012 Hyundai i20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lexus ES will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lexus ES | 2012 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Lexus | Hyundai |
Model | ES | i20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 17:01 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |