2004 Lexus ES vs. 2013 Lexus RX

To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lexus ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lexus ES would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lexus ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lexus RX (266 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2004 Lexus ES. (216 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2004 Lexus ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 401 kg more than 2004 Lexus ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Lexus RX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lexus ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lexus RX (336 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lexus ES. (325 Nm). This means 2013 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lexus ES. 2004 Lexus ES has automatic transmission and 2013 Lexus RX has manual transmission. 2013 Lexus RX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lexus ES will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Lexus ES 2013 Lexus RX
Make Lexus Lexus
Model ES RX
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3310 cc 211 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V electric
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 216 HP 266 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 336 Nm
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83 mm 83 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Front AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1569 kg 1970 kg
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1885 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1695 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2740 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.1 L/100km 8.3 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 11.8 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]