2004 Lexus LF-C vs. 1985 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2004 Lexus LF-C is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Astro would be higher.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lexus LF-C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Lexus LF-C has automatic transmission and 1985 Chevrolet Astro has manual transmission. 1985 Chevrolet Astro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lexus LF-C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lexus LF-C | 1985 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Lexus | Chevrolet |
| Model | LF-C | Astro |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1985 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 183 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2830 mm |
