2004 Lexus SC vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lexus SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lexus SC would be higher. At 4,277 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lexus SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lexus SC (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 2. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lexus SC should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lexus SC weights approximately 782 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Lexus SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lexus SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lexus SC (441 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 2. (137 Nm). This means 2004 Lexus SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lexus SC | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Lexus | Mazda |
Model | SC | 2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4277 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1742 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 43 L |